UnsaidToday

OpenAI's $110B raise isn't about innovation—it's about monopolizing AI and crushing competition.

Thoughts?
Reactions

Share your take and be featured here.

Oracle's AI Gamble: A Short-Sighted Bet on Efficiency Over Ethics
Featured · AI · Org Design · Automation · Ethics

Oracle's AI Gamble: A Short-Sighted Bet on Efficiency Over Ethics

13 April 2026 · 6 min readRead article →
1 / 3

Oracle announced in October 2024 that it would eliminate 32,000 positions—roughly 20% of its workforce—while simultaneously committing $15 billion to expand its AI cloud infrastructure. The company framed this as "strategic realignment for the AI era." What it actually represents is corporate America's latest experiment in replacing human judgment with algorithmic efficiency, consequences be damned.The math appears compelling at first glance.

"The most expensive employee you can lose is the one who understands...

Eliminating 32,000 positions frees up $5.7 billion in ongoing expenses while the AI infrastructure investment is largely a one-time capital expenditure. Chief Technology Officer Larry Ellison described the move as "building tomorrow's Oracle today," but the reality is more prosaic: Oracle is trading institutional knowledge and human oversight for immediate cost reduction.Oracle's decision reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of sustainable growth. The company assumes that AI systems can seamlessly replace human roles without accounting for the institutional knowledge that walks out the door with each terminated employee. When IBM pursued a similar strategy between 2020 and 2023, cutting 28,000 jobs while investing heavily in Watson AI, the company discovered that efficiency gains were offset by critical knowledge gaps in client relationships and system maintenance.The telecommunications sector offers a telling parallel.

Read more →
Stay informed
Weekly dispatch on AI, systems thinking, and organisational design.